Legal Opinion
Bruto v. Herman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment and order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and complaint and third-party complaint dismissed. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: Plaintiff, an employee of a subcontractor, third-party defendant William Higgins & Sons, Inc., was injured in 1966 when he fell from a scaffold erected in violation of subdivision 2 of section 240 of the Labor Law. Plaintiff sued George Herman and Associates, Inc., the general contractor, and Dyna Crete Corporation, the subcontractor responsible for supplying precast concrete for the project. In its contract with the project owner,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duda v. John W. Rouse Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Iacono v. Frank & Frank Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Sarnoff v. Charles Schad, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Deso v. Albany Ladder Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Galbraith v. John B. Pike & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schwartz v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Oakley v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979