Ulster Savings Bank v. Goldman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George B. Ceresia, Jr., J.
Plaintiff commenced the above-captioned action to foreclose a mortgage allegedly given by defendants. Defendant Elizabeth Goldman served an answer consisting of a general denial and containing a single affirmative defense, lack of personal juris*894diction. On January 12, 1999 plaintiff made a motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212. The court denied the motion in a decision-order dated May 26, 1999 upon a finding that plaintiff failed to establish its corporate status.* On the prior motion, plaintiff submitted the affidavit of Terry L.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Spa Realty Associates v. Springs AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Barnes v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Grassel v. Albany Medical Center HopitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Canzoneri v. Wigand Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greene v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001