Legal Opinion

City of St. Albans v. Arsenault - Decision on Motion

Vermont Superior Court

Decided September 19, 2019No. 38-3-19 VtecPublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 38-3-19 Vtec City of St. Albans v Ross Arsenault ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Count 1, Municipal Enforcement (38-3-19 Vtec) Title: Motion for Default Judgment (Motion 2) Filer: City of St. Albans Attorney: Colin K. McNeil Filed Date: July 25, 2019 No response filed The motion is DENIED. The City of St. Albans (“City”) seeks judgment by default against Ross Arsenault (“Defendant”), due to Defendant’s failure to timely file an answer to the City’s complaint in the above-captioned municipal enforcement action. The record reflects that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrus v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Neal v. BrockwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API