Legal Opinion

Owensby v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1919No. 1241PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Bartlett. Haralson superior court. October 21, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

1. “A party tea case has the right to introduce all competent, relevant, and material evidence, either to prove the main issue involved, or to discredit the evidence of a witness for the opposite party.” Tiller v. State, 111 Ga. 840 (36 S. E. 201). Accordingly, on the trial of a criminal case the State may introduce any competent, relevant, and material evidence for the purpose of disproving the contention of the defendant, or for the purpose of discrediting his defense, and it affords'no valid ground of objection that such evidence may tend incidentally to put the defendant’s character in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Tiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Jarrard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Little v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Rooker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API