Legal Opinion

Hartsell v. Pipes Auto Shop, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1975No. 12679PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

The judgment below rejected plaintiff HartselPs demands against Pipes and Pipes’ reconventional demands against Hartsell. Hartsell appeals.

Pipes is in the business of dismantling wrecked vehicles, salvaging and selling the parts therefrom. Plaintiff owned a 1969 Chevrolet which was damaged in the front and rear in a three-car accident. The car was considered to be a “total loss”, not worthy of repair.

Plaintiff’s father “shopped” several wrecking yards about disposition of the wrecked automobile before contacting Pipes. Plaintiff’s father described the condition of the wrecked…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pan American Production Co. v. RobichauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Jefferson Truck Equipment Co. v. Guarisco Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. North Development Company, Inc. v. McClureLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. ChappuisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Winford v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mark A. Gravel Properties, LLC v. Eddie's BBQ, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Newport v. Treadaway Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Mark A. Gravel Properties, LLC v. Eddie's Bbq, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API