Legal Opinion

Hurvitz v. Lopinsky

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

By decree of October 15, 1921, the plaintiff’s bill was dismissed for want of equity jurisdiction, and plaintiff appealed.

*22The bill prayed for an injunction to restrain Eugene TI. Lopinsky from prosecuting an action of assumpsit against .plaintiff as surviving partner of himself and'J. M. Lopinsky, instituted on a note of $3,000.00 dated June 4, 1913, and due four months after date, made'payable to Eugene H. Lopinssy and signed by Hurvitz & Lopinsky; and on an open account of $1,500.00 for services rendered by plaintiff to Hurvitz & Lopinsky, from January 1, 1913, to July 1, 1914.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eddy v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Evans v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huntington Engineering Co. v. GallaherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Moore v. HamiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Neal Coal Co. v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API