Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Haynes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1989No. 20,576-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGHTOWER, Judge.

In these proceedings, a district court judgment granted a curatrix authority to execute, on behalf of the interdict, a Declaration of Paraphernality reserving as separate property, pursuant to LSA-C.C. Art. 2339, the mineral royalties from the interdict’s separate land. The court also denied a claim by the interdict’s wife for support from her husband’s estate.

On appeal the wife contends that the role and powers of a curator do not include the filing of such a declaration and that her claim for support should have been granted. Finding her arguments to be unpersuasive, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hotard v. HotardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  2. Interdiction of LeechSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  3. In re Interdiction of RonstromLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hebert v. WiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. In Re Succession of CarawayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Interdiction of FieldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API