Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 13, 2010No. 09A648PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as:

558 U. S. ____

(2010) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 09A648 _________________ DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH ET AL. v. KRISTIN M. PERRY ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [January 13, 2010] PER CURIAM. We are asked to stay the broadcast of a federal trial. We resolve that question without expressing any view on whether such trials should be broadcast. We instead determine that the broadcast in this case should be stayed because it appears the courts below did not follow the appropriate procedures set forth in federal law before changing their rules to allow…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joshua Frost v. Ron Van BoeningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API