Legal Opinion

People v. Weinstein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1968No. Gen. 52,656PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mcnamara

The defendant, Irwinna Weinstein, was indicted for the murder of her husband, Harvey Weinstein. The defendant made a motion to suppress certain physical evidence on the ground that this evidence was obtained as a result of illegal search and seizure. The court granted defendant’s motion to suppress this evidence, and the State appeals from that order. The State contends that the searches and seizures were valid, and that the court erred in allowing the motion to suppress. The State is also appealing an order which suppressed certain statements made by defendant to the police. For our opinion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bradley v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. ShambleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. The PEOPLE v. PerroniIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SteinbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. People v. BochniakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. BoehmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Botsford v. StokesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API