Johnson v. Schultz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The clauses of the bill which control the controversy provide that the amount bequeathed Minnie Schultz, or such portion thereof as remained undisposed of at the time of her death, was to go to her sisters or their heirs. The intention of the testator in this respect plainly appears to be that he did not intend that those who would normally inherit from Mrs. Schultz if she died without is,sue, should take the property. It also clearly appears that the identical property delivered to Minnie Schultz under the will remained unchanged and readily identifiable at her death. In fact, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schomberg v. GaenslenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Estate of LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Harter v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Brundage v. TowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of HauckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941