Legal Opinion

People v. Hight

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1949No. Crim. 4327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

From a conviction of kidnapping defendants demand a reversal of the judgment on the grounds of (1) insufficiency of the evidence, (2) its inconsistency with the jury’s implied findings and (3) the improbability of its truth.

The Evidence Is Sufficient

The evidence adopted by the jury established that about 12:15 a. m., of a morning in May, 1948, appellants were engaged in operating games of chance in the city of Compton. Some 15 persons were present in the old barn gambling hall when a group of bandits swooped down upon and robbed them, taking from appellants about $2,300. During the criminal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. Tom WooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. AmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. KlinkenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. People v. McCreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. People v. PicaroniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. CalpitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. WitzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API