Legal Opinion
Hantman v. Randolph Twp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 13, 1959PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
58 N.J. Super. 127 (1959)
155 A.2d 554
NORMAN HANTMAN AND ADA HANTMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 13, 1959.
Decided November 13, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.
Mr. Ralph Porzio argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.
Mr. Harry L. Sears argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Young and Sears, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.
Plaintiffs, Norman and Ada Hantman, are owners of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beerwort v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Heagen v. Borough of AllendaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Gross v. AllanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Schafer v. Thurston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
- Antonelli Construction, Inc. v. MilsteadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Deblasio v. Zoning Board Of Adjustment For The Township Of West AmwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Town of Belleville v. Parrillo's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Nuckel v. Borough of Little Ferry Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.