Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Holt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1913No. 18,389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson district court; ROSWELL L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

In a division of land among the heirs of James Sexton a tract containing 96 acres was divided between his two sons. Arnold received the east 48 acres and Henry the west 48 acres of the tract. Arnold erected a house, barn, and other improvements' at a point just east of the center of the line between the two subdivisions. Henry also owned land lying north and south of that, belonging to Arnold. Many years ago the two brothers established a driveway extending from Arnold’s barn to the north line of the 96-acre tract. Arnold states the facts as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dotson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Jobling v. TuttleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConlonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Phœnix Insurance v. HaskettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Fiest v. SteereSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Ferguson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API