Legal Opinion

George R. Knippen v. Ford Motor Company George R. Knippen v. Ford Motor Company, and Winifrede B. Deweese

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 8, 1976No. 75-1892, 75-2049PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

The issues presented in these consolidated appeals arise out of an automobile accident in which George R. Knippen (Knippen) was struck by a 1968 Mercury station wagon manufactured by Ford Motor Company (Ford). After a full trial Judge Robinson entered a judgment against Ford on the jury’s special verdict that Ford had breached its duty to design a vehicle which protects against unreasonable risk of injury and had proximately caused enhancement of Knippen’s injuries. Ford’s three pronged attack on this judgment alleges that the trial court erred in: 1) holding that Ford…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Pearl Sellers, Administratrix of Estate of Clay D. Sellers, Deceased v. John J. O'COnnellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Leo R. Fountila, Jr. v. Mary E. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API