Legal Opinion

Shelley v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 25, 1994No. Docket No. 5765-92UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT A. SHELLEY AND BETTY B. SHELLEY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Shelley v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5765-92

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-432; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 444; 68 T.C.M. (CCH) 584; 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1953;

August 25, 1994, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

For petitioners: Timothy J. Warfel.

For respondent: Harris L. Bonnette, Jr.

CLAPP

CLAPP

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

CLAPP, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to petitioners' Federal income taxes as follows:

Additions to Tax

Year

Sec.

Sec.

End…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James T. Alford Freda Alford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. James T. Alford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API