Legal Opinion
Romer v. Fountain Sanitation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 19, 1995No. 94SA302PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
The petitioners, the Governor and the Attorney General of the State of Colorado, 1 initiated this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21 to obtain a -writ of prohibition against the El Paso County District Court. The petitioners request this court to prohibit the trial court from exercising jurisdiction over this civil action initiated by the respondent, the Fountain Sanitation District (the district). Having issued a rule to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted, we make the rule absolute.
I
The district is a special district governed by the provisions of the Special…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Lamm v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Krupp v. Breckenridge Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- City & County Denver v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Atlas Biologicals v. BiowestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Academy of Charter Schools v. Adams County School District No. 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.