Legal Opinion

Michel v. Hirabayashi

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 30, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered February 13, 1985 affirmed, with $10 costs.

On or about March 5, 1983, petitioners, as landlords, filed an application with the Office of Rent Control, Manhattan District Rent Office, for an order decontrolling the subject rent-controlled apartment on the ground that the housing accommodation was not occupied by respondent as her primary residence (New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations § 18). Following respondent’s submission of exhibits, the District Rent Director issued an order dated May 25, 1984 denying the landlord’s application. The agency found…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
  4. Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  5. Ehrlich v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parisi v. HinesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API