Legal Opinion
Hoa Ho v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided May 13, 1993No. 01-91-00199-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of selling an obscene videotape and assessed his punishment at 365-days confinement, probated, and a $500 fine. Appellant asserts five points of error. We affirm.
Appellant asserts in his first point of error that the evidence is insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the allegedly obscene material is “a motion picture film,” as alleged in the information. He urges that the amended information, which alleges his sale of “one videotape,” was invalid; therefore, he reasons, there is a fatal variance between the original…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Hess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Aleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
- Aleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.