Legal Opinion

United States v. E. Hogshire, Son & Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, District Judge.

The United States are suing Hogshire and the bonding company for $1,634.62. The action is brought to recover on a bond executed by Hogshire as principal and the bonding company as surety, and was conditioned to pay, on demand by the collector, such tax as the Commissioner found to be due. The defendant, on April 1, 1918, filed its corporation income and excess profits tax return for the year 1917, and paid the tax. On March 26, 1923, and within the five-yea/r period, the Commissioner assessed an additional tax of $1,105.55, and in the latter part of April, following,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. RootCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. Wyoming Central Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. Charleston Lead WorksDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1931
  4. Rothensies ex rel. United States v. Schoettle Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. United States v. Calumet Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API