Legal Opinion

Diana Laura Espinosa Castillo v. Kristi Noem, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 2, 2026No. 2:25-cv-04867Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Diana Laura Espinosa Castillo, No. CV-25-04867-PHX-KML (MTM) 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 Kristi Noem, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 In responding to the order to show cause, respondents reassert their legal position 16 that individuals such as petitioner are subject to mandatory detention. (Doc. 7 at 1-2.) 17 Respondents concede petitioner is a member of the class certified in Bautista v. Santacruz, 18 No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. Supp. 3d ----,

2025 WL 3713987

(C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 19 2025), which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Javier Sanchez-Espinoza v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Badger Catholic, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Stephen Redd v. Patricia GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API