Legal Opinion
McKaskle v. Wiggins
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 23, 1984No. 82-1135PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
465 U.S. 168 (1984)
McKASKLE, ACTING DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
v.
WIGGINS
No. 82-1135.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 9, 1983
Decided January 23, 1984
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Leslie A. Benitez, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Jim Mattox, Attorney General, David R. Richards, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Nancy M. Simonson, Assistant Attorney General.
Craig Smyser, by appointment of the Court, 460 U. S. 1035, argued the cause pro hac vice and filed a…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · O'Connor; Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. FedalizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. FedalizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. Sowell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016