Frayer v. Holtom
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Error from Ness district court; J. E. Andrews, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Milton, J.:
The issue between the plaintiff in error and the defendants in error, who were respectively plaintiff and defendants below, may be summed up as follows : The answer averred that the plaintiff had no right of action on the mortgage which he sought to foreclose for the reasons that, in a transaction between the plaintiff and defendant George Holtom, whereby certain lands were actually exchanged and transferred between the parties, the plaintiff had accepted a deed from George Holtom and Ann Holtom, his wife, for the mortgaged premises, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ayres v. ProbascoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. UlmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Strange v. MaloneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Cheney v. EggertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917