Legal Opinion

Frayer v. Holtom

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 20, 1898No. 259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Ness district court; J. E. Andrews, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J.:

The issue between the plaintiff in error and the defendants in error, who were respectively plaintiff and defendants below, may be summed up as follows : The answer averred that the plaintiff had no right of action on the mortgage which he sought to foreclose for the reasons that, in a transaction between the plaintiff and defendant George Holtom, whereby certain lands were actually exchanged and transferred between the parties, the plaintiff had accepted a deed from George Holtom and Ann Holtom, his wife, for the mortgaged premises, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ayres v. ProbascoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. UlmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Strange v. MaloneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Cheney v. EggertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API