Legal Opinion

Olinghouse v. Olinghouse

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1954No. 35701Published

1Opinion of the Court

265 P.2d 711 (1954)

OLINGHOUSE

v.

OLINGHOUSE.

No. 35701.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

January 12, 1954.

O.C. Lassiter, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Quinn Dickason, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Parties are referred to herein as in the trial court.

Plaintiff, Francis Olinghouse, sued defendant, Glenn Olinghouse, for divorce, alimony and child support money, alleging that Rebecca Lenora Olinghouse was the child of the parties hereto. After hearing, the trial court awarded plaintiff a divorce and child support money. Defendant has appealed.

Defendant alleges, and the evidence showed,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mudd v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Mantz v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Clark v. BarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Thomey v. ThomeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Branson v. BransonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API