State v. Oppenheimer
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Jackson. Tried below before the Hon. Geo. W. Burkhart.
1Opinion of the Court
Devine, Associate Justice.
The defendant was indicted for having committed the crime of perjury, and, on motion of defendant, the court quashed the indictment.
The District Attorney appealed from the judgment of the court, and the question presented for our consideration is the sufficiency of the indictment. • The motion of defendant set forth that “ the indictment charged no offense known to the law, and is altogether too vague and indefinite to sustain a verdict.”
The indictment should have stated that the oath was taken and the matter sworn to in some judicial proceeding. (3 Arch. Cr. Prac,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- McCullar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- State v. Ah LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Gabrielsky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.