Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury Fund

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 13, 2010No. 26880Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones

I dissent in part and concur in part, and would affirm the decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) holding that S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-600 (2005) is inapplicable to these reimbursement requests.

Chapter 3 of Title 15, entitled “Limitation of Civil Actions,” is concerned with the time periods, i.e. statutes of limitation, within which a ‘civil action’ can be commenced. A “civil action” within the meaning of Title 15 is brought in a court, and is “commenced when the summons and complaint are filed with the clerk of court ...” S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-20(B) *433(2005). See also Rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Greenwood Mills, Inc. v. Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API