Howard S. v. Lillian S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Freedman, J.
This interlocutory appeal in a matrimonial action raises two issues. The first is whether defendant wife’s alleged misrepresentation to plaintiff husband that he was the biological father of one of their children, when in fact the child was conceived during her adultery and fathered by her lover, constitutes “egregious fault” sufficient to be considered in equitably *189distributing the marital property. We affirm the motion court’s holding that, under the circumstances here, it should not. The second is whether the motion court properly limited plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Blickstein v. BlicksteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Howard S. v. LILLIAN S.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Revell v. GuidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Empire State Shipping Service, Ltd. v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Howard S. v. LILLIAN S.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
- McSpedon v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.