Legal Opinion

Gowen v. Bessey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 10, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On Report. The ease is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFogler, J.

This is an action of trespass quare clausum. The locus is described as lot No. 165 in the New Cemetery, so called, in the town of Brooks.

*115In 1887, the town of Brooks, under a vote of the town, purchased a parcel of land as an addition to its cemetery, and had the land so purchased surveyed and divided into lots, the bounds of which were permanently marked, and caused a plan to be made upon which the lots were designated and numbered. By vote of the town non-residents were charged twenty dollars per lot. Lots were furnished to inhabitants of the town free of chai’ge, though the town never so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beatty and Ritchie v. Kurtz and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Sohier v. Trinity ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Meagher v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Smith v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AchesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Hertle v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Hornblower v. Masonic Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Masonic Cemetery Ass'n v. GamageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. Rowley v. Laingsburg Cemetery Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API