People v. Simmons
Monroe County Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sam L. Valleriani, J.
Defendant filed a motion seeking an in camera review of Officer Ferrigno’s personnel file. The City of Rochester filed opposition papers.1 The court conducted oral argument on the matter at which the defendant and the City amplified their positions. Based on the court’s review of counsels’ respective submissions and their oral arguments, the court signed a subpoena duces tecum ordering that the entirety of the contents of Officer Ferrigno’s personnel file be provided to the court for an in camera review pursuant to People v Gissendan*992ner (48 NY2d 543…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RuizCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2017