Legal Opinion

Howe v. Woodruff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1859PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from the Lagrange Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Complaint by the appellant against the appellees, to redeem certain mortgaged premises.

The substantial facts set up in the complaint, are, that in October, 1853, Cornelia M. Baker, being then the owner of the premises in question, with her husband, Charles F. Baker, mortgaged the same to one Martha J. Fish, to secure the payment of three notes—one for 100 dollars, one for 44 dollars, 62 cents, and one for 55 dollars, 38 cents; that afterwards, said Martha assigned the note for 100 dollars, and the mortgage, to Otis Neivton, who, on the 12th of September, 1854, assigned the note and mortgage…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gardner v. AstorNew York Court of Chancery · 1817

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Elston v. CastorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Sidener v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hewitt v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Coburn v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API