Legal Opinion
Campeau v. Neuroscience, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 15, 2015No. 14-cv-324-jdpPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Danielle Ailts Campeau contends that her former employers, defendants NeuroScience, Inc. and Pharmasan Labs, Inc., paid her and other female employees less than male employees with similar experience, .responsibility, and seniority. In this suit, Campeau alleges violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Equal Pay Act (EPA), 29 U.S.C. § 206. Defendants have counterclaimed against Campeau for breach of a tuition reimbursement agreement.
Campeau brings this action on behalf of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Loretta Cheek v. Western and Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Schnellbaecher v. Baskin Clothing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brink, Andrew v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
- Jeremy Dyer, Steven Wetzel, and James Ju, individually on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Skogen’s Foodliner, Inc. d/b/a Festival FoodsDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- Luna Vanegas, Jose v. Signet Builders, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023