Legal Opinion · Dissent

DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 28, 2013No. SC10-897Published

1DissentCanady, J.

Although I agree that the Court has jurisdiction to consider this case, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the decision on review-DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC, 31 So.3d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) — is in express and direct conflict with Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc., 190 So.2d 777 (Fla.1966). In DK Arena, the question involved the enforceability of an oral agree*100ment to “hold in abeyance” a requirement of an existing written contract. See DK Arena, 31 So.3d at 319. Tanenbaum is distinguishable because it involved an attempt to establish the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Bradley v. SanchezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. DK Arena, Inc. v. EB ACQUISITIONS I, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API