Legal Opinion
Hiden v. Mahanes
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 8, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa county, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
On January 8, 1913, D. E. Preddy conveyed a tract of land to G. L. Lascalleet, who at the same time and as part of the same transaction, conveyed the land to J. G. Hiden, trustee, to secure to Preddy the payment of a number of notes aggregating $4,950, which, less $50 paid in cash, was the total amount of the purchase price.
The deed of trust was duly recorded on February 20, 1913, and was in what we may term the usual form, except as to the following special provision:
“The said parties of the first part also covenant and agree that as long as any part of the indebtedness hereby secured shall…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Stuart v. PennisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Flanary v. KaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Young v. Camp Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. LynchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Feuchtenberger v. Williamson, Carroll & SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Mega International Commerce Bank v. MCAP Capital, L.L.C.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2007