Legal Opinion
Reliance Insurance v. McGrath
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 23, 1987No. C 84-7279 TEHPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
Reliance Insurance Company brought this action against its insured, Bryant G. McGrath, seeking declaratory judgment that it is not liable, under a marine insurance policy that it issued to the defendant, for the damage claimed to have been sustained by the insured yacht, MY MISTRESS II. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 1333. The case was tried without a jury. Based on the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, I conclude that plaintiff is not liable for the claimed loss, and the defendant McGrath should take nothing by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Sun Mutual Insurance v. Ocean InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Putnam Resources v. Ronald M. Pateman, Ronald M. Pateman v. Frenkel & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Ted Montford, AKA Theodore F. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England International Assurety of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1991
- Washington International Insurance v. MelloneDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Witcher Construction Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.