Legal Opinion

Booher v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2002No. 49S00-0007-CR-441PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendant, Mark Booher, was convicted of robbery as a class B felony and for the January 1999 murder of Timothy Laflen in Indianapolis. The defendant’s appeal asserts that the State failed to disclose favorable exculpatory evidence, that the State engaged in misconduct by presenting and arguing a baseless and prejudicial theory, and that the trial court erred in sentencing him for robbery as a class B felony. We affirm.

Failure to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to correct error which sought a new trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Maldonado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Benson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bruce Ryan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hape v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Gregory v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API