Legal Opinion

Matteson v. Dewar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Judson F. Going, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error was plaintiff and plaintiffs in error were defendants in the trial court. The cause was tried by the 'court, without a jury, and the court found for the plaintiff and assessed his damages at the sum. of $119.50. The suit was brought August 26, 1907, and was on a promissory note made by the defendants, of date December 1, 1905, for the sum of ' $107, with interest at 7 per cent, per annum, after maturity, payable in 60 days after date, to the order of A. E. Matteson. The note was put in evidence by the plaintiff.

Ge…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Claflin v. WolffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  3. New Netherland Bank of New York v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Thomas v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API