Legal Opinion

Arlington Peanut Co. v. Dozier

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 18, 1931No. 21406Published

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. While it is the general rule that a tender required by a contract may be waived by conduct amounting to a repudiation of the contract, or by obstructing and preventing the tender (Blount v. Lynch, 24 Ga. App. 217, 100 S. E. 644), still, where a contract for purchase and sale provided for the future delivery of a certain number of tons of peanuts of a specified grade (number 1), the mere rejection by the pur*437clmsor cf a portion of the amount of peanuts purchased, tendered [or delivery under the contract, on the ground that the peanuts tendered were not of the grade specified by the contract,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson Elevator Co. v. North Georgia Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Phosphate Mining Co. v. Atlanta Oil & Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Blount v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Willett Seed Co. v. Kirkeby-Gundestrup Seed Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Small v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API