Legal Opinion

Sherry-Netherland Corp. v. Mandel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 17, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

It is a well-recognized canon of construction that courts may take judicial notice of the interpretation of the provisions of a statute or of the regulations of an administrative agency given by officers charged with enforcement thereof. (Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566; Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp., 289 N. Y. 21.)

The construction required here is of the phrase “ a room * # * regularly offered for rent during the thirty days ending on March 1, 1943,” et cetera, as used in subdivisions (a) and (b) of section 4 of the Rent Regulation for Hotels and Rooming Houses in New York City…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bullock v. . CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shanks Village Committee Against Rent Increases v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. 816 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. LeonardCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API