Legal Opinion

State v. McLean

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1963No. 5269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

Frank McLean was indicted and tried for, and found guilty by a jury of, the offense of armed robbery under Section 2901.13, Revised Code. From the judgment of guilty, Frank McLean has lodged an appeal on questions of law in this court, saying: that the trial court erred by—

“a. The overruling of defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that there was no armed robbery committed.

“b. The failure to give the special written instructions to the jury requested by the defendant,” and that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The evidence is overwhelming against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luitze v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. State v. NoblinOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DeboeOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. DyeOhio Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API