Legal Opinion

Norris v. Branham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1977No. 6633PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHEN F. PRESLAR, Chief Justice.

This is a civil action for damages resulting from an assault and battery. The question presented is whether there is a fatal conflict between an issue finding that an assault and battery was committed by the Defendant, Mike Brown, and one finding that he acted in self-defense. The trial Court overruled the contention that there was a conflict and entered judgment for the Defendants/Appellees. We affirm.

[I] Appellant sued the Appellees for an assault committed upon him by one of the Appellees in the place of business of the other which resulted in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Service, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. March v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis MunozTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Drew Ryser v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  3. Gibbins v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Liveoak v. Ingham, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1982
  5. Richard King v. Patti LabelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API