Legal Opinion

Altschul v. City of Springfield

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1933No. 326 & 327PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By KUNKLE, J.

Plaintiff, as such taxpayer, asks that the court enjoin the defendants from entering into or performing said proposed contract and from doing any act in fulfillment of the terms of said contract and that such injunction be made permanent.

A demurrer was filed to the petition, which was overruled, and thereupon the city of Springfield and Ralph E. Garvin, its City Manager, and also the defendant Caffrey, Griffin and Bahin, Inc., filed separate answers in which many of the averments of the petition were denied and in the ans.wer of the city of Springfield the reasons are…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. F. Buddie Contracting, Inc. v. SeawrightDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  3. Wilson Bennett, Inc. v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Executone of Northwest Ohio, Inc. v. CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Matter of Application of Air Terminal Services, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API