Legal Opinion

William Cunningham v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, California State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1965No. 19344_1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was convicted of possessing narcotics in violation of state law. He filed a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that his conviction was based upon evidence seized in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing.

I

Appellant’s timely petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to the California Supreme Court for direct review of the judgment of conviction was denied after the decision of Mapp v.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PlatouSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. People v. McGrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. Willie Sledge and Doni WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. AverellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  5. Irene Lucero v. Thomas W. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API