Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1985)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided October 24, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Dr. Brunner:

This letter is in response to the following question:

Does a school district have the right to enter into a contract with the Department of Natural Resources to borrow money for energy conservation measures without the approval of [a] two-thirds majority of eligible voters under . . . [Section] 164.231 [sic]. If so, may the loan funds be repaid with the revenues derived from energy cost savings which will be calculated annually.

As we understand the situation, you wish to know if constitutional legislation can be enacted that allows the Department of Natural Resources to lend…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saleno v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Bell v. City of FayetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Clark v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. First National Bank of Stoutland v. Stoutland School District R2Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API