Garesche v. Hill
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge. Appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee in time prescribed by law, entitled respondent to an affirmance of the judgment. Martin v. White, 11 Mo. 214; Hardison v. Steamboat, 13 Mo. 226; Starr v. Stewart, 18 Mo. 410; Milligan v. Dunn, 19 Mo. 643; Westphaling v. Enright, 60 Mo. 279; Hollomad v. Railroad, 92 Mo. 284; Donzelot v. Tillottson, 8 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge. Appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee in time prescribed by law, entitled respondent to an affirmance of the judgment. Martin v. White, 11 Mo. 214; Hardison v. Steamboat, 13 Mo. 226; Starr v. Stewart, 18 Mo. 410; Milligan v. Dunn, 19 Mo. 643; Westphaling v. Enright, 60 Mo. 279; Hollomad v. Railroad, 92 Mo. 284; Donzelot v. Tillottson, 8 Mo. App. 565; Wilson v. Ryan, 15 Mo, App. 597; Dalton v. McCaffery, 20 Mo. App. 61; Davis v. Miller, 35 Mo. App. 253; Rosenthal v. Rubinstein, No. 6935 St. L. Ct. of Appeals.…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
Erom a judgment of a justice of the peace the defendant appealed to the circuit court, city of St. Louis; he failed to pay the filing fee, as required by the statute relating to the St. Louis circuit court. 2 R. S. 1889, p. 2148, sec. 17; thereupon the plaintiff paid the filing fee, caused the case to be docketed, and moved for an affirmance of the judgment for failure of the defendant to prosecute his appeal; this motion was sustained, and the judgment of the justice was affirmed; defendant filed a motion to set aside the judgment of affirmance and to reinstate the cause, offering to pay the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dalton v. McCafferyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885