Aiken County v. BSP Division of Envirotech Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BLATT, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action by the plaintiffs, Aiken County and Aiken County Public Service Authority (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Aiken County”), 2 to recover damages arising out of the construction of the Horse Creek Pollution Control Facility (the “project”), located near Aiken, South Carolina. Both plaintiffs are political subdivisions of the State of South Carolina with the capacities to sue and be sued.
Envirotech Corporation (“Envirotech”) 3 and Insurance Company of North America (“INA”) are corporations organized and existing under the laws of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Dolores M. Moran, of the Estate of Edward P. Moran, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Addy v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aiken County v. BSP Division of Envirotech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Aiken County Aiken County Public Service Authority v. Bsp Division of Envirotech Corporation Insurance Company of North America Envirotech Corporation, & Third Party v. Bay-Con General, Inc. The Travelers Indemnity Company, Third Party and Davis & Floyd Engineering, Inc., Third Party Aiken County Aiken County Public Service Authority v. Bsp Division of Envirotech Corporation Insurance Company of North America Envirotech Corporation, & Third Party v. Bay-Con General, Inc. The Travelers Indemnity Company Davis & Floyd Engineering, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989