Legal Opinion

Claybrook v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1957No. 5 Div. 497Published

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This 'is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction in a bastardy proceeding. Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, requires an assignment of errors. The lack of such an assignment disposes of this appeal. See Brown v. State, 36 Ala.App. 151, 53 So.2d 633.

Parenthetically and as pure obiter dictum, we wish to state that an examination of the record and a consideration of the appellant’s brief fail to disclose reversible error. The newly discovered evidence described to support a new trial was much like that in Keel v. State, 35 Ala.App. 515, 49 So.2d 320,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API