Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sandstead v. Corona (In re Estate of Sandstead)

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA0231Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JUDGE TAUBMAN, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶ 77 This case illustrates what happens when a decedent tries, and fails, to avoid probate by passing her property in joint tenancy to two of her three heirs. It is an exercise in asset transfers gone awry. Because I disagree with the majority that the Citizens Bank estate account established by Vicki J. Sandstead (Sandstead), the original personal representative (PR) of the estate and one of the daughters of decedent Auriel Sandstead (Auriel), was not estate property and that the original Citizens Bank accounts did not fit within an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Gordon v. BensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Moffett v. Life Care Centers of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API