Legal Opinion

Holland v. Beto

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 12, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 68-H-919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOEL, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM:

Plaintiff, a prisoner in state custody, brought this action to restrain the defendant prison officials from interfering with his use of the mails. Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1343.

The petition here fails to state a claim as to which federal relief would be appropriate. Carswell v. Wainwright, 413 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1969) (per curiam); Granville v. Hunt, 411 F.2d 9 (5th Cir. 1969).

Alternatively, assuming arguendo that the petition states a federally cognizable claim, it must be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Plaintiff cites only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Lawrence William Wright v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. A. D. Granville v. W. B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Dean Rene Peters v. Jack T. Rutledge, Sheriff and Jailer of Muscogee County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ricciotti v. Warwick School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Bailey v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API