Holland v. Beto
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NOEL, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM:
Plaintiff, a prisoner in state custody, brought this action to restrain the defendant prison officials from interfering with his use of the mails. Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1343.
The petition here fails to state a claim as to which federal relief would be appropriate. Carswell v. Wainwright, 413 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1969) (per curiam); Granville v. Hunt, 411 F.2d 9 (5th Cir. 1969).
Alternatively, assuming arguendo that the petition states a federally cognizable claim, it must be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Plaintiff cites only…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lawrence William Wright v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- A. D. Granville v. W. B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Dean Rene Peters v. Jack T. Rutledge, Sheriff and Jailer of Muscogee County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ricciotti v. Warwick School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
- Bailey v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970