Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Ashment-Mccarthy
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 5, 2014No. S14F0265PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Melton, Justice.
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 34, Joseph B. McCarthy (Husband) filed an application for discretionary appeal, following the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside a final decree regarding his divorce from Annie J. Ashment-McCarthy (Wife). We granted the pro se application and posed the following question: “Did the trial court err in failing to make the findings required to support the deviation from the presumptive amount of child support? See OCGA § 19-6-15 (i); Holloway v. Holloway, 288 Ga. 147 (702 SE2d 132) (2010).” For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kuriatnyk v. KuriatnykSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Brogdon v. BrogdonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Leggette v. LeggetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fladger v. FladgerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Amoakuh v. IssakaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Fladger v. FladgerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Jarvis Denmark v. Department of Family and Children ServicesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- McLendon v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.