Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Minyard
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Under our previous decisions, count X of the complaint must be held sufficient as against the several grounds of demurrer. Republic I. & S. Co. v. Williams, 168 Ala. 612, 53 South. 76; Wilson v. Gulf States Steel Co., 194 Ala. 311, 69 South. 921; Republic I. & S. Co. v. Harris, 202 Ala. 344, 80 South. 426. Appellant cites to the contrary the cases of Tenn., etc., Co. v. Williamson, 164 Ala. 54, 51 South. 144, and Horan v. Gray, etc., Co., 159 Ala. 159, 48 South. 1029. The first of these deals with a complaint drawn, as was count X here, under the third subdivision of the Employers’ Act (Code,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mary Lee Coal & Railway Co. v. ChamblissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. WilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Wilson v. Gulf States Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. CornettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970