Legal Opinion

Stanley Works v. Rockwell Mfg. Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 7290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

1. This is án action for a declaratory judgment and arises from an actual controversy between the plaintiff and the defendant as to the validity and alleged infringement by the plaintiff of United States Letters Patent to H. E. Tautz, No. 2,069, 395, granted February 2, 1937 (on application Serial No. 45,933, filed October 21, 1935) to The Delta Manufacturing Company, a. corporation of Wisconsin, as assignee of said Tautz.

2. Plaintiff, The Stanley Works, is a Connecticut corporation and has its principal place of business at New Britain, Connecticut. It…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ALLEGHENY DROP FORGE COMPANY v. Portec, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Wintermute v. Hermetic Seal Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API